Romans 3:5-8
5But if our unrighteousness serves to show the righteousness of God, what shall we say? That God is unrighteous to inflict wrath on us? ( I speak in a human way.) 6By no means! For then how could God judge the world? 7But if through my lie God’s truth abounds to his glory, why am I still being condemned as a sinner? 8And why not do evil that good may come?—as some people slanderously charge us with saying. Their condemnation is just.
In the last post, we looked at the first four verses of this tricky little passage which begins Romans 3. In it, Paul answers an objection that could be raised against him – How can the Jews be both in a secure covenant relationship with God and yet be condemned by God? His answer was that being given privileges by God, like the OT and prophets, does not equal obedience. Sin still ruins relationship with God – even great King David knew it, and Paul quotes him from Psalm 51:4 Against you, you only, have I sinned and done what is evil in your sight, so that you may be justified in your words and blameless in your judgment. God’s character is not in question – sinful humanity’s is. God is faithful, and declared justified and blameless in his judgment. God would be proved true, even if the whole world were a bunch of liars.
Paul could have moved on from there, but in vv5-8 he quickly squashes a counter-objection – though by the sounds of it, he doesn’t think very highly of it at all, …as some people slanderously charge us with saying. Their condemnation is just (v8). That’s some powerful language. Let’s look at this counter objection.
* If the sinfulness of humanity serves to show the righteousness of God when he judges as (as vv1-4 say), then isn’t God unfairly inflicting wrath on us? Aren’t we doing him a favour by showing everyone how righteous he is? How can he judge us for that?! He should thank us! *
Paul doesn’t buy this for a second – and I hope you don’t either! It’s just word play – and Paul shows it up very quickly. “For how then could God judge the world?” Paul uncovers a simple contradiction – ‘You know God’s going to judge the world (it’s part of your argument) – but how can God judge the world if he doesn’t have anything to judge?’ Sin has been neatly removed from their equation – which is just foolish! This is what happens when you remove sin from your Christian worldview – you have a God who has nothing to judge, and therefore has no distinction between him and us – which is just insane!
Paul cuts even further through the foolishness of all this in verse 7, But if through my lie God’s truth abounds to his glory, why am I still being condemned as a sinner? He’s saying,”You lot (obviously the group that is bringing these kinds of accusations against him), you lot call me a sinner, and a liar in what I say – but why condemn me for it if my sin glorifies God! You can’t have your cake and eat it too!”
He finishes his scathing rebuke with a line that sums up the foolishness of all this talk – Why not do evil that good may come?…Their condemnation is just.
This got me thinking. These arguments sound ridiculous – as if anyone would believe them! But they’re not far off arguments I hear today. “How can God be fair in judging me for my sin, when he supposedly planned my sin to happen, supposedly because he wants to be glorified?!” I’m sure you’ve heard something like that before. Romans is clear. It’s not God’s sin. It’s yours (like you said). Therefore, you deserve condemnation. And you’ll get it. Your condemnation is just. This generation just wants to squirm out of sin any old way it can – point the finger at God, say there’s no absolute morality, say their sinless, blame someone else – they’re simply ridiculous responses, just like the ones Paul got! The condemnation of sinners has been just, their condemnation is just, and will be just. The next part of Romans 3 seeks to nail that very coffin once and for all…
Thankful to God for helping me understand a passage I never really understood before,
Matt.